Yes, you read that right "All Religion is Flawed". The goal of any religion is to portray the "Worshipped" of the chosen religion in a perspective that is far superior to the "worshipped" of alternative religions. And yet no one asks where all these chaos originated from. I was speaking to a guy the other day whose religion borders on the principle that the individual in his religion is God. That you made (or make) the decision of where you are now (or need to be) from where you have been (in terms of being born). So I asked him "Are you saying I have been here (the world) before?". He said "Yes". Then I said "Are you saying I chose to come back here (the world)?". He said "Yes". So I said to him "Wake up. It doesn't make any sense why would I choose to come back to this sh*t hole if I have already been here before. And on top of that to be my own God I will have to be all-knowing, all-powerful and all-seeing". He said "You are". Then I replied "That means that all of us in this world are our own Gods". He said "We are". Damn, talk about a classic case of "too many cooks spoil the broth". Imagine one billion plus (1, 000, 000, 000+) all-knowing, all-powerful and all-seeing Gods working around on this earth for their individual, selfish reasons. Talk about Chaos.
This isn't written in order to take a swipe at anyone's religion. I just got tired of listening to all the "Come and worship my God" or "My God is the shiznit" nonsense.
I don't know a lot of what I expect from a religion but here are a few things that I know and believe:
a) I am not God. Simply because I don't know it all, I don't see it all and I can't do it all
b) It is not possible for any human being (flesh and blood) to be God (same reason as (a))
c) There is a God. Simply because it takes creativity to create something as interesting as this world. The air I breathe, the water I drink, the food I eat, the women I see and so on. Its all perfect except for one (1) thing "chaos"
d) It is clear that there is good and there is evil. And both definitely do not like one another.
e) Human beings love to receive good things or things that make us feel good all the time (a promotion, lovely gifts, a check in the mail, a beautiful wife, a pretty girlfriend, a loving husband, a caring boyfriend, a cool car, a nice house, a tasty meal, a good hair do and so on. The list is endless). Which means we clearly lean towards good in our receiving but in our giving that's another story (the classic shades of gray symptom).
To summarize, a good-loving intelligent God created this world and created human beings to live in it. Note that I have reserved the use of the words: all-knowing, all-seeing and all-powerful to describe this God. Why did I say "good-loving"? Simply because I do not think that an "evil-loving" God will create beings who constantly love to receive good things. Evil likes evil, Good likes good. So it seems only natural that their offsprings would like what their parents like (at least on the receiving side of things).
Now the question arises "How did a good-loving God create something (or someone) that loves to receives good things all the time but on the giving side of things, it (he/she) can give either good or evil?". Good question. Unfortunately, I don't know the answer to that. If I did I would be all-knowing (you see my point).
However a few possibilities come to mind:
a) A fundamental flaw in the design (or in computer speak, a bug in the programming). If this is true it would definitely undermine the perception of an all-knowing God that many religions proclaim. I hope you now see why I reserved the word "all-knowing" to describe the God that created this world.
b) The design was done intentionally (or on purpose). Now this one is interesting. Why? Simply because it would mean good created something that could please evil. Maybe good has a crush on evil (pun intended). Reminds me of high school. This would definitely grant credibility to the "free-will" concept of some religions.
In summary, if it was a flaw in the design then why hasn't it been fixed all these thousands of years later. Does it mean that the Creator doesn't care or simply doesn't mind that evil festers. Or does it simply mean the Creator cannot fix it. That would mean the Creator is not "all-powerful" as some would have us believe. On the other side of things, if it was a purposeful design why is it a criminal gets punished for using his/her design feature. That is, if the feature is there and it is used is it valid to consider it a crime. "I wonder, I really wonder". The same applies to religions with an "after-life" concept. Either way you will get punished for evil whether it was the Creator's design fault that the ability to do evil was there in the first place or whether you exercised your "free-will" in doing the evil. Both ways you are screwed.
In conclusion, I am hoping you see why I began by saying "All Religion is Flawed". They all say the same thing "Follow me if you want to see the light". Unfortunately, there is no light at the end of all their tunnels. My advice, if you like receiving good so much, others like it as well so you should try as much as possible to give out as much good as you can on a daily basis (or their might be a shortage of good in the world).
Thank you, have a nice day and may the Creator (whoever that may be) be with you all. (Pun intended).
This isn't written in order to take a swipe at anyone's religion. I just got tired of listening to all the "Come and worship my God" or "My God is the shiznit" nonsense.
I don't know a lot of what I expect from a religion but here are a few things that I know and believe:
a) I am not God. Simply because I don't know it all, I don't see it all and I can't do it all
b) It is not possible for any human being (flesh and blood) to be God (same reason as (a))
c) There is a God. Simply because it takes creativity to create something as interesting as this world. The air I breathe, the water I drink, the food I eat, the women I see and so on. Its all perfect except for one (1) thing "chaos"
d) It is clear that there is good and there is evil. And both definitely do not like one another.
e) Human beings love to receive good things or things that make us feel good all the time (a promotion, lovely gifts, a check in the mail, a beautiful wife, a pretty girlfriend, a loving husband, a caring boyfriend, a cool car, a nice house, a tasty meal, a good hair do and so on. The list is endless). Which means we clearly lean towards good in our receiving but in our giving that's another story (the classic shades of gray symptom).
To summarize, a good-loving intelligent God created this world and created human beings to live in it. Note that I have reserved the use of the words: all-knowing, all-seeing and all-powerful to describe this God. Why did I say "good-loving"? Simply because I do not think that an "evil-loving" God will create beings who constantly love to receive good things. Evil likes evil, Good likes good. So it seems only natural that their offsprings would like what their parents like (at least on the receiving side of things).
Now the question arises "How did a good-loving God create something (or someone) that loves to receives good things all the time but on the giving side of things, it (he/she) can give either good or evil?". Good question. Unfortunately, I don't know the answer to that. If I did I would be all-knowing (you see my point).
However a few possibilities come to mind:
a) A fundamental flaw in the design (or in computer speak, a bug in the programming). If this is true it would definitely undermine the perception of an all-knowing God that many religions proclaim. I hope you now see why I reserved the word "all-knowing" to describe the God that created this world.
b) The design was done intentionally (or on purpose). Now this one is interesting. Why? Simply because it would mean good created something that could please evil. Maybe good has a crush on evil (pun intended). Reminds me of high school. This would definitely grant credibility to the "free-will" concept of some religions.
In summary, if it was a flaw in the design then why hasn't it been fixed all these thousands of years later. Does it mean that the Creator doesn't care or simply doesn't mind that evil festers. Or does it simply mean the Creator cannot fix it. That would mean the Creator is not "all-powerful" as some would have us believe. On the other side of things, if it was a purposeful design why is it a criminal gets punished for using his/her design feature. That is, if the feature is there and it is used is it valid to consider it a crime. "I wonder, I really wonder". The same applies to religions with an "after-life" concept. Either way you will get punished for evil whether it was the Creator's design fault that the ability to do evil was there in the first place or whether you exercised your "free-will" in doing the evil. Both ways you are screwed.
In conclusion, I am hoping you see why I began by saying "All Religion is Flawed". They all say the same thing "Follow me if you want to see the light". Unfortunately, there is no light at the end of all their tunnels. My advice, if you like receiving good so much, others like it as well so you should try as much as possible to give out as much good as you can on a daily basis (or their might be a shortage of good in the world).
Thank you, have a nice day and may the Creator (whoever that may be) be with you all. (Pun intended).
First time on your blog...very interesting post. I must admit that you have a point, and even though I am Christian and believe wholeheartedly in the Holy Trinity, I can't argue with you. Haha...:) I'll have to come back and read this again though, it's two a.m. and my brain is not processing at optimal levels. :) Thanks for a great read!
ReplyDelete@Timlou_x Thanks for reading it with an open mind. I honestly expected my first comment to be a religious bashing.
ReplyDeleteYour intro was really humourous! (sounds like the Law of Humourousity in the Sincerity of Reality). But that done, I see you had one premise and upon that flawed all religion. the assessment again being a third party evidence! I know you can do better than that. So what am I saying? Looking at your response it seems more a provocation at your previous, percieved or peddled norms or to provoke them in revolt and rebellion than to objectively do an analysis of religion using 'your' logic. looking at the magnitude of your title it is begging for an argument. Give me one!
ReplyDelete@udedojo forgive me for being a little slow. I read ur comment and didnt understand a word of it. "Which part of it is 3rd party?" and so on. I was looking for anything objective dat tells me ur religion is different and didn't find it. I only found a good user of words.
ReplyDelete